You can already get a quad-core system for less than $1,000, and we've heard about new quad-core PCs coming out next year in the sub-$800 range. And if Intel reduces its prices in response, we could see some very inexpensive quad-core desktops on store shelves next year. I have an older mobo, MSI K9A2 Platinum AM2+ with PCI-E 2.0 slots only. AMD demonstrated with the Athlon 64 X2 that it is not afraid to cut prices to compete with Intel, which could improve the Phenom's bang-for-the-buck prospects. I would like to have some possible options for a replacement video card. Buy Used - Like New: AMD Phenom 9500 - Phenom X4 Agena Quad-Core 2.2 GHz Socket AM2+ 95W Processor - HD9500WCGDBOX with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. That doesn't bode well for AMD and the 65 nanometer Phenom, which can't overtake even Intel's current-gen chips.ĭespite all of that doom and gloom for the Phenom, its future could get brighter. Our test of the first of these new parts, the Core 2 Extreme QX9650, showed that Intel's new design has a noticeable performance impact over Intel's older 65 nanometer chips. We also expect that Intel will add to its Core 2 family by bringing its new, more heat and power-efficient 45 nanometer design into mainstream dual-core and quad-core CPUs. Over the next few months, AMD will expand its Phenom offerings to include two higher-end models, the Phenom 9700 at 2.4GHz, and the 9900 at 2.6GHz. Perhaps you can make a case for the Phenom 9500, but even at $40 less, the performance loss is enough so that you'd notice gamers, photo editors, and multitaskers, especially. And considering prices right now, we don't think the $10 savings on the higher-end Phenom 9600 is worth the performance hit. The chart below gives the significant details as to how the Phenom 9500 and Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 stack up against each other:Īs you can see, on every single test, the Phenom chips fall behind their Core 2 Quad competitor. Here are some examples of searches: HD9500WCJ4BGD, AMD Phenom X4 2.2GHz, Agena 95 Watt, K10 4 cores 4 threads, 0. Only aggressive pricing from AMD kept its old dual-core. The problem is that neither the size of the data chunks nor the speed at which Phenom can process them, give AMD's new chips enough of a boost. For raw performance, AMD's Athlon 64 X2 chips have lingered behind their Intel Core 2 Duo counterparts all year. In theory, that dynamic distribution of work should give Phenom an advantage over Intel's Core 2 design. Its flexibility ranges from pumping out one large chunk of data to a single core, or sending four smaller chunks across all four processors. Similar to recent advances in 3D chip design, the Phenom's unified 元 cache provides a data store the size of which changes depending on the amount of data coming through. While Intel's Core 2 Quad design basically melds two dual-core chips together, AMD's Phenom is the first to include four cores that all share at least one level of cache in this case, the Level 3 cache. AMD has made much of the fact that its Phenom is the first "true" quad-core CPU.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |